“There will be forthcoming opportunities for companies to partner with NASA in establishing a long-term human presence at the Moon under the agency’s Artemis program,” the space agency said in a statement on the ruling. With Hertling’s ruling, NASA says that work on SpaceX’s lunar lander can resume “as soon as possible.” SpaceX’s bid came in at about $2.9 billion, less than half of Blue Origin’s $5.99 billion bid. There had been hints that cost may have been a factor in NASA’s decision to select only SpaceX. lawmakers weighed in by proposing an amendment to a bill that would have added $10.03 billion to NASA’s budget and allow for the selection of two proposals as previously planned. The legal wrangling has officially held up work on NASA’s lunar lander. The GAO ruled that NASA had not made any error in its selection process.īlue Origin filed its lawsuit against NASA soon afterward. Soon after the final down-select, Blue Origin and Dynetics both filed complaints with the Government Accountability Office (GAO). ![]() Blue Origin and Dynetics had also been in the running. Law Students Win Compassionate Release for Clients Through GULC Clinics. Ironically, SpaceX's proposal is no more intrinsically dangerous than anybody else's from just a quick glance, and the reason why can be summed up with a single sentence: They don't launch with people onboard and they're only occupied from lunar orbit to the lunar surface. SpaceX had submitted a Starship-derived lunar lander that may have been vaguely reminiscent of some retro artwork of crewed lunar missions from before even the Apollo lunar landings. Virginia judge rules human embryos are chattel based on centuries-old. "YOU HAVE BEEN JUDGED!" he posted on Twitter, using a meme of the comic book and film character Judge Dredd.Three proposals had still been in the running before NASA selected SpaceX for the exclusive contract. Musk reacted in his signature style-with a bit of snark. Federal Court of Claims released the redacted version of the lawsuit filed in August by Jeff Bezos Blue Origin against NASA and Elon Musks SpaceX over a lucrative lunar lander contract awarded earlier this year. "Blue Origin remains deeply committed to the success of the Artemis program, and we have a broad base of activity on multiple contracts with NASA to achieve the United States' goal to return to the Moon to stay," the company said. The justification for the ruling was not immediately made public, and remained under seal.īlue Origin said in a statement that its complaint had "highlighted the important safety issues with the Human Landing System procurement process that must still be addressed." ![]() Judge Richard Hertling ruled in NASA's favor on Thursday. The GAO rejected the company's claims, and Blue Origin took the matter to the Court of Federal Claims. Blue Origin gambled and lost with its Moon lander proposal by hoping NASA would be willing to negotiate its 5.9 billion price tag, agency attorneys write in blunt legal filings obtained by. In April, NASA announced it had awarded the contract to Musk's company-a deal worth $2.9 billion.īut Blue Origin filed a complaint about the decision to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), saying the bidding process had been unfair and that NASA should have offered more than one contract. The U. ![]() "NASA will resume work with SpaceX under the Option A contract as soon as possible," the agency said in a statement after the ruling. Federal judge releases redacted lunar lander lawsuit from Bezos Blue Origin against NASA, SpaceX. The ruling put an end to a months-long legal battle that had prevented the US space agency from working with SpaceX on the lunar lander called Starship, which will allow Americans to return to the Moon as part of the Artemis program.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |